Can we afford screening for neural tube defects? The South Wales experience.
- 26 January 1985
- Vol. 290 (6464) , 293-295
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.290.6464.293
Abstract
Clinical and financial gains and losses accruing from five different options for screening for open neural tube defects were estimated, based principally on the results of detailed monitoring of inputs and outcomes and of process costs in the South Wales Anencephaly and Spina Bifida Study. As well as estimating the overall clinical costs of a screening service it was shown that if the prevalence, including terminations, of open neural tube defects is between 1.25 and five per 1000 births the financial cost of avoiding the birth of a seriously handicapped child who would survive for more than 24 hours is in the range 9000 pounds- 54000 pounds depending on the option adopted and the prevalence of the condition in the target population. Prevalence is the biggest determinant of cost. The data should provide a basis for assessment and discussion of resource priorities in the National Health Service.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- DIAGNOSTIC EFFECTIVENESS OF ULTRASOUND IN DETECTION OF NEURAL TUBE DEFECTThe Lancet, 1983
- THE EFFICACY OF A SERUM SCREENING SERVICE FOR NEURAL-TUBE DEFECTS: THE SOUTH WALES EXPERIENCEThe Lancet, 1983
- Screening for neural‐tube defects and maternal anxietyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1982
- DIAGNOSTIC ULTRASOUND - EARLY DETECTION OF FETAL NEURAL TUBE DEFECTS1980
- EARLY PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS OF NEURAL TUBE DEFECTS BY ULTRASOUNDClinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1977
- Screening for spina bifida cystica. A cost-benefit analysis.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1976
- Natural History of Spina Bifida Cystica and Cranium Bifidum Cysticum: Major Central Nervous System Malformations in South Wales, Part IVArchives of Disease in Childhood, 1971