Reply to Comment on ‘‘Experimental test of the Anderson–Mott transition model for excitation transport’’
- 15 July 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by AIP Publishing in The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Vol. 73 (2) , 1005-1006
- https://doi.org/10.1063/1.440220
Abstract
It is argued that the critical electronic energy transfer EET concentrations observed in naphthalene2,4 are not accounted for by the Klafler and Fortner1,3,5 models of an Anderson transition. (AIP)Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Diffusive and percolative lattice migration: ExcitonsThe Journal of Chemical Physics, 1980
- Electronic energy transfer in impurity bands of mixed organic solidsThe Journal of Chemical Physics, 1979
- Time resolved exciton migration in mixed naphthalene crystals: triplet and singlet critical concentrationsChemical Physics Letters, 1979
- Experimental test of the Anderson–Mott transition model for excitation transporta)The Journal of Chemical Physics, 1979
- Comments on the applicability of the Anderson localization model for electronic energy transfer in mixed organic solidsChemical Physics Letters, 1978
- Critical concentrations for triplet exciton tunneling in binary naphthalene crystals: the case for percolationChemical Physics Letters, 1978
- Electronic energy transfer in mixed organic solids: Anderson localization or delocalization?Chemical Physics Letters, 1978
- Critical concentration for electronic energy transfer in mixed organic solidsChemical Physics Letters, 1977
- Long range exciton percolation and superexchange: Energy denominator study on 3B1u naphthaleneChemical Physics, 1977