High‐throughput quantification for a drug mixture in rat plasma – a comparison of Ultra Performance™ liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry with high‐performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
A quantitative Ultra Performance™ liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (UPL/MS/MS) protocol was developed for a five‐compound mixture in rat plasma. A similar high‐performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS/MS) quantification protocol was developed for comparison purposes. Among the five test compounds, three preferred positive electrospray ionization (ESI) and two preferred negative ESI. As a result, both UPLC/MS/MS and HPLC/MS/MS analyses were performed by having the mass spectrometer collecting ESI multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) data in both positive and negative ion modes during a single injection. Peak widths for most standards were 4.8 s for the HPLC analysis and 2.4 s for the UPLC analysis. There were 17 to 20 data points obtained for each of the LC peaks. Compared with the HPLC/MS/MS method, the UPLC/MS/MS method offered 3‐fold decrease in retention time, up to 10‐fold increase in detected peak height, with 2‐fold decrease in peak width. Limits of quantification (LOQs) for both HPLC and UPLC methods were evaluated. For UPLC/MS/MS analysis, a linear range up to four orders of magnitude was obtained with r2 values ranging from 0.991 to 0.998. The LOQs for the five analytes ranged from 0.08 to 9.85 ng/mL. Three levels of quality control (QC) samples were analyzed. For the UPLC/MS/MS protocol, the percent relative standard deviation (RSD%) for low QC (2 ng/mL) ranged from 3.42 to 8.67% (N = 18). The carryover of the UPLC/MS/MS protocol was negligible and the robustness of the UPLC/MS/MS system was evaluated with up to 963 QC injections. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit: