Comparison of mortality rates in acute myocardial infarction treated by percutaneous coronary intervention versus fibrinolysis
- 1 January 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 95 (1) , 100-101
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.08.069
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Percutaneous coronary intervention versus fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction: is timing (almost) everything?The American Journal of Cardiology, 2003
- A Comparison of Coronary Angioplasty with Fibrinolytic Therapy in Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trialsPublished by Elsevier ,2003
- Long distance transport for primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction Final results of the randomized national multicentre trial—PRAGUE-2European Heart Journal, 2003
- A randomized trial of transfer for primary angioplasty versus on-site thrombolysis in patients with high-risk myocardial infarction: The air primary angioplasty in myocardial infarction studyPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Multicentre randomized trial comparing transport to primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis vs combined strategy for patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting to a community hospital without a catheterization laboratory. The PRAGUE StudyEuropean Heart Journal, 2000
- Prospective randomised comparison between thrombolysis, rescue PTCA, and primary PTCA in patients with extensive myocardial infarction admitted to a hospital without PTCA facilities: a safety and feasibility studyHeart, 1999
- Early Revascularization in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic ShockNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999