Quality of life and surgical outcome after total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease: A randomized, controlled trial
- 1 March 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
- Vol. 14 (2) , 145-152
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2006.08.009
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological diseasePublished by Wiley ,2005
- Evaluation of quality of life after laparoscopic surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic SurgerySurgical Endoscopy, 2004
- Results of eVALuate study of hysterectomy techniques: Conversion to open surgery should not be regarded as major complicationBMJ, 2004
- Cost effectiveness analysis of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with standard hysterectomy: results from a randomised trialBMJ, 2004
- The eVALuate study: two parallel randomised trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomyBMJ, 2004
- Postoperative fatigue negatively impacts the daily lives of patients recovering from hysterectomyPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,2002
- Does Randomization Introduce Bias in Unblinded Trials?Epidemiology, 2000
- A Randomized Trial With a Cost-Consequence Analysis After Laparoscopic and Abdominal HysterectomyPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1998
- A 12-Item Short-Form Health SurveyMedical Care, 1996
- The rand 36‐item health survey 1.0Health Economics, 1993