Sensitivity and specificity of classification systems for fatness in adolescents
Open Access
- 1 September 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Vol. 80 (3) , 597-603
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/80.3.597
Abstract
Background: Various body mass index (BMI) standards have been proposed for defining overweight in adolescence, but few studies have evaluated their diagnostic accuracy. Objective: We compared the sensitivity and specificity of BMI-based classification systems for detecting excess fatness in adolescents. Design: A cross-sectional analysis of 474 adolescents aged 17 y was used. Body composition was measured by using densitometry. The international BMI-based systems recommended by the International Obesity Task Force and the World Health Organization were evaluated on the basis of their sensitivity and specificity for detecting excess body fat. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to derive cutoffs to maximize the sum of sensitivity and specificity. True positives were defined by using the percentage body fat cutoffs proposed by Williams et al (Am J Public Health 1992;82:358-63). Results: For both classification systems, the specificity for overweight was high for both sexes (0.95–1.00). The sensitivity was fairly high for the males (0.72–0.84) but was very low for the females (0.22–0.25). For the males, a BMI cutoff equal to the 85th percentile on a Swedish BMI reference chart maximized the sum of sensitivity and specificity while having both high sensitivity (0.92) and high specificity (0.92). For the females, larger tradeoffs in specificity were needed to improve sensitivity. The mean (±SE) areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for the males and the females were 0.97 ± 0.02 and 0.85 ± 0.02, respectively. Conclusions: Recommended international classification systems have very high specificity, which results in few cases of nonoverweight adolescents being mislabeled as overweight. However, the sensitivity is very low in female adolescents. Thus, many overweight female adolescents could be missed in intervention programs that use the proposed international BMI cutoffs as selection criteria.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Screening for childhood obesity: international vs population-specific definitions. Which is more appropriate?International Journal of Obesity, 2003
- Detection of cardiovascular risk factors by indices of obesity obtained from anthropometry and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in Japanese individualsInternational Journal of Obesity, 2003
- Body mass index in 7–9-y-old French children: frequency of obesity, overweight and thinnessInternational Journal of Obesity, 2002
- Obesity: diagnosis, prevention, and treatment; evidence based answers to common questionsArchives of Disease in Childhood, 2002
- Identification of the obese child: adequacy of the body mass index for clinical practice and epidemiologyInternational Journal of Obesity, 2000
- Population‐based body mass index reference values from Göteborg, Sweden: birth to 18 years of ageActa Paediatrica, 2000
- Assessment of obesity in a community sample of prepubertal childrenInternational Journal of Obesity, 1999
- Age- and maturity-related changes in body composition during adolescence into adulthood: The Fels Longitudinal StudyInternational Journal of Obesity, 1997
- Body fatness and risk for elevated blood pressure, total cholesterol, and serum lipoprotein ratios in children and adolescents.American Journal of Public Health, 1992
- The Robustness of the "Binormal" Assumptions Used in Fitting ROC CurvesMedical Decision Making, 1988