When is Enough Enough? Ethical Dilemmas on the Burn Unit

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Modern burn care often leads to the dilemma of what should or should not be done for patients with clinical deterioration and organ system failure who fail to respond to therapy. The questions are, "When is enough enough?" and "Who decides?" We have developed a structured conference to address these issues and to help us decide whether to recommend continued invasive diagnostic and therapeutic intervention or to allow the patient to "die with dignity." This conference can be requested by any member of the burn team who feels uncomfortable with what is being done for and/or to a patient. It is a meeting of the entire team, and its purpose is to discern the judgment of the group. When the consensus decision is to forego additional therapy, the decision is then presented to the patient (if he or she is able to understand and respond) and to the patient's family. The decision made by the group removes the responsibility of any individual from making a stressful decision if the patient's condition deteriorates abruptly. Patients who accept this decision exhibit a peaceful calm that invariably reaffirms the group dynamics. The family often experiences a great deal of relief, because they are not forced to make the decision even though they wanted it made. Inviting nurses to be active participants in the decision process builds their personal and professional self-esteem and binds the team members into a more tightly knit community. The attending staff may perceive this process as an abdication of responsibility; however, in our experience the consensus conference has led to a conviction that the wisdom of the team is always best.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: