Mechanism-driven biomarkers to guide immune checkpoint blockade in cancer therapy
Top Cited Papers
- 15 April 2016
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Reviews Cancer
- Vol. 16 (5) , 275-287
- https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc.2016.36
Abstract
Exploration for biomarkers for drugs that block immune checkpoints should be rationally conducted based on knowledge of the mechanism of action of the targeted pathway. The programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated antigen 4 (CTLA4) pathways are unique, and there are special considerations based on mechanisms of action for developing biomarkers for drugs blocking each of these pathways. Biomarkers for immune checkpoint-blocking drugs currently fall into three major categories: immunological, genetic and virological. Future work may reveal additional markers related to metabolism and the microbiome. Immunological biomarkers offer the advantage of applicability across multiple tumour types amenable to immune checkpoint blockade. In the case of anti-PD1 drugs, tumour PD1 ligand 1 (PDL1) expression is a pretreatment biomarker that predicts a greater likelihood of response to therapy. Despite technical pitfalls that make clinical application challenging, two PDL1 immunohistochemistry tests are currently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for guiding treatment decisions in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and melanoma. Although no specific oncogene or driver mutation has yet been correlated with clinical response to immune checkpoint blockade, overall tumour mutational burden reflecting neoantigenic diversity may have predictive value. This is exemplified by the high anti-PD1 response rate in DNA mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancers (which have a large mutational burden and which account for ∼15% of all colon cancers), whereas mismatch repair proficient colon cancers are unlikely to respond. Virus-associated cancers, which account for more than 20% of cancers worldwide, express viral neoantigens that are strongly immunogenic. Early evidence demonstrates expression of PD1–PDL1 in these cancers, and suggests responsiveness to anti-PD1 therapies. Combination treatment regimens based on immune checkpoint-blocking drugs are emerging as the next step in clinical development to improve efficacy and response durability. Biomarker considerations for these regimens are complex and are likely to involve multifactorial assessments.Keywords
This publication has 123 references indexed in Scilit:
- Safety and Activity of Anti–PD-L1 Antibody in Patients with Advanced CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2012
- Safety, Activity, and Immune Correlates of Anti–PD-1 Antibody in CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2012
- Integrated NY-ESO-1 antibody and CD8+T-cell responses correlate with clinical benefit in advanced melanoma patients treated with ipilimumabProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011
- Improved Survival with Ipilimumab in Patients with Metastatic MelanomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Single‐institution experience with ipilimumab in advanced melanoma patients in the compassionate use settingCancer, 2010
- Anti-CTLA-4 therapy results in higher CD4 + ICOS hi T cell frequency and IFN-γ levels in both nonmalignant and malignant prostate tissuesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009
- Oncogenic kinase NPM/ALK induces through STAT3 expression of immunosuppressive protein CD274 (PD-L1, B7-H1)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008
- CTLA-4 blockade enhances polyfunctional NY-ESO-1 specific T cell responses in metastatic melanoma patients with clinical benefitProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008
- CTLA-4 blockade increases IFNγ-producing CD4 + ICOS hi cells to shift the ratio of effector to regulatory T cells in cancer patientsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008
- Immunologic and clinical effects of antibody blockade of cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 in previously vaccinated cancer patientsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008