Comparison of Water Potentials Measured by In Situ Psychrometry and Pressure Chamber in Morphologically Different Species
- 1 February 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Plant Physiology
- Vol. 74 (2) , 316-319
- https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.74.2.316
Abstract
Leaf water potentials measured by in situ psychrometry were compared with leaf water potentials measured by the pressure chamber technique at various values of water potential in Helianthus annuus, H. nuttallii, Vigna unguiculata, Nerium oleander, Pistacia vera and Corylus avellana. In V. unguiculata, the leaf water potentials measured by the in situ psychrometer oscillated at the same periodicity as, and proportional to, the leaf conductance. In all species, potentials measured by in situ psychrometers operating in the psychrometic mode were linearly correlated with potentials measured with the pressure chamber. However, the in situ psychrometers underestimated the leaf water potential in the 2 Helianthus spp. at low water potentials and overestimated the water potential in P. vera, N. oleander and C., avellana. The underestimation in the 2 Helianthus spp. at low water potentials resulted from differences in water potential across the leaf. The overestimation in P. vera, N. oleander and C. avellana was considered to arise from low epidermal conductances in these species even after abrasion of the cuticle. Pressure-volume studies with Lycopersicon esculentum showed that less water was expressed fromdistal than proximal leaflets when the whole leaf was slowly pressurized. The implication of this for water relations characteristics obtained by pressure-volume techniques is discussed. In situ psychrometers are suitable for following dynamic changes in leaf water potential, but should be used with caution on leaves with low epidermal conductances.This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- In Situ Field Measurement of Leaf Water Potential Using Thermocouple PsychrometersPlant Physiology, 1983
- Alternate methods of analysing water potential isotherms: some cautions and clarifications. II. Curvilinearity in water potential isothermsCanadian Journal of Botany, 1982
- Correction of Flow Resistances of Plants Measured From Covered and Exposed LeavesPlant Physiology, 1981
- Alfalfa Water Potential Measurement: A Comparison of the Pressure Chamber and Leaf Dew‐point Hygrometers1Crop Science, 1981
- Comparison between pressure-volume and dewpoint-hygrometry techniques for determining the water relations characteristics of grass and legume leavesOecologia, 1979
- The Relationship Between Transpiration Rate, Water Potential, and Resistances to Water Movement in Sunflower (Helianthus annuusL.)Journal of Experimental Botany, 1979
- Short-term and long-term effects of plant water deficits on stomatal response to humidity in Corylus avellana L.Planta, 1979
- Comments on the psychrometric determination of leaf water potentialsin situPlant and Soil, 1977
- Leaf Water Potentials Measured with a Pressure ChamberPlant Physiology, 1967
- Regulation of hibernating periods by temperature.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1965