Ultraviolet Damage and Nucleosome Folding of the 5S Ribosomal RNA Gene
- 29 December 1999
- journal article
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Biochemistry
- Vol. 39 (3) , 557-566
- https://doi.org/10.1021/bi991771m
Abstract
The Xenopus borealis somatic 5S ribosomal RNA gene was used as a model system to determine the mutual effects of nucleosome folding and formation of ultraviolet (UV) photoproducts (primarily cis−syn cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers, or CPDs) in chromatin. We analyzed the preferred rotational and translational settings of 5S rDNA on the histone octamer surface after induction of up to 0.8 CPD/nucleosome core (2.5 kJ/m2 UV dose). DNase I and hydroxyl radical footprints indicate that UV damage at these levels does not affect the average rotational setting of the 5S rDNA molecules. Moreover, a combination of nuclease trimming and restriction enzyme digestion indicates the preferred translational positions of the histone octamer are not affected by this level of UV damage. We also did not observe differences in the UV damage patterns of irradiated 5S rDNA before or after nucleosome formation, indicating there is little difference in the inhibition of nucleosome folding by specific CPD sites in the 5S rRNA gene. Conversely, nucleosome folding significantly restricts CPD formation at all sites in the three helical turns of the nontranscribed strand located in the dyad axis region of the nucleosome, where DNA is bound exclusively by the histone H3−H4 tetramer. Finally, modulation of the CPD distribution in a 14 nt long pyrimidine tract correlates with its rotational setting on the histone surface, when the strong sequence bias for CPD formation in this tract is minimized by normalization. These results help establish the mutual roles of histone binding and UV photoproducts on their formation in chromatin.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Differential nucleosome positioning on Xenopus oocyte and somatic 5 s RNA genes determines both TFIIIA and H1 binding: a mechanism for selective H1 repressionJournal of Molecular Biology, 1998
- Modulations in Chromatin Structure During DNA Damage Formation and DNA RepairPublished by Springer Nature ,1998
- DNA damage can alter the stability of nucleosomes: Effects are dependent on damage typeProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1997
- Nucleosomal anatomy – where are the histones?BioEssays, 1995
- Chromatosome positioning on assembled long chromatin: Linker histones affect nucleosome placement on 5 S rDNAJournal of Molecular Biology, 1991
- The structure of DNA in a nucleosome.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1990
- Origin of ultraviolet damage in DNAJournal of Molecular Biology, 1989
- Structure-function studies of the T4 endonuclease V repair enzymeMutation Research/DNA Repair, 1989
- UV MUTAGENIC PHOTOPRODUCTS IN Escherichia coli AND HUMAN CELLS: A MOLECULAR GENETICS PERSPECTIVE ON HUMAN SKIN CANCER*Photochemistry and Photobiology, 1988
- Histone hyperacetylation. Its effects on nucleosome core particle transitionsBiophysical Journal, 1988