Testing coherent reflection in chinchilla: Auditory-nerve responses predict stimulus-frequency emissions
- 1 July 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Acoustical Society of America (ASA) in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Vol. 124 (1) , 381-395
- https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2917805
Abstract
Coherent-reflection theory explains the generation of stimulus-frequency and transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions by showing how they emerge from the coherent “backscattering” of forward-traveling waves by mechanical irregularities in the cochlear partition. Recent published measurements of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) and estimates of near-threshold basilar-membrane (BM) responses derived from Wiener-kernel analysis of auditory-nerve responses allow for comprehensive tests of the theory in chinchilla. Model predictions are based on (1) an approximate analytic expression for the SFOAE signal in terms of the BM traveling wave and its complex wave number, (2) an inversion procedure that derives the wave number from BM traveling waves, and (3) estimates of BM traveling waves obtained from the Wiener-kernel data and local scaling assumptions. At frequencies above 4 kHz , predicted median SFOAE phase-gradient delays and the general shapes of SFOAE magnitude-versus-frequency curves are in excellent agreement with the measurements. At frequencies below 4 kHz , both the magnitude and the phase of chinchilla SFOAEs show strong evidence of interference between short- and long-latency components. Approximate unmixing of these components, and association of the long-latency component with the predicted SFOAE, yields close agreement throughout the cochlea. Possible candidates for the short-latency SFOAE component, including wave-fixed distortion, are considered. Both empirical and predicted delay ratios (long-latency SFOAE delay/BM delay) are significantly less than 2 but greater than 1. Although these delay ratios contradict models in which SFOAE generators couple primarily into cochlear compression waves, they are consistent with the notion that forward and reverse energy propagation in the cochlea occurs predominantly by means of traveling pressure-difference waves. The compelling overall agreement between measured and predicted delays suggests that the coherent-reflection model captures the dominant mechanisms responsible for the generation of reflection-source otoacoustic emissions.Keywords
This publication has 61 references indexed in Scilit:
- Longitudinally propagating traveling waves of the mammalian tectorial membraneProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007
- Transmission matrix analysis of the chinchilla middle earThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2007
- Evidence for Outer Hair Cell Driven Oscillatory Fluid Flow in the Tunnel of CortiBiophysical Journal, 2007
- Wiener Kernels of Chinchilla Auditory-Nerve Fibers: Verification Using Responses to Tones, Clicks, and Noise and Comparison With Basilar-Membrane VibrationsJournal of Neurophysiology, 2005
- Wiener-Kernel Analysis of Responses to Noise of Chinchilla Auditory-Nerve FibersJournal of Neurophysiology, 2005
- Comparison of group delays of 2f1−f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions and cochlear travel timesAcoustics Research Letters Online, 2004
- The origin of periodicity in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissionsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1995
- Noninvasive measurement of the cochlear traveling-wave ratioThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1993
- A cochlear frequency-position function for several species—29 years laterThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1990
- Tails of tuning curves of auditory-nerve fibersThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1974