Idealism, Relativism, and the Ethic of Caring
- 1 May 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Psychology
- Vol. 122 (3) , 243-248
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1988.9915511
Abstract
In this study, we investigated Gilligan's (1982) theory of moral thought. Two hundred sixteen American college students (73% women and 20.5% black) completed two questionnaires designed to measure individual differences in personal moral philosophies. Analyses indicated that individuals who endorsed an ethic of caring also tended to have higher scores on the idealism scale of the Ethics Position Questionnaire, r = .53. Caring was also slightly correlated with the rejection of moral relativism, r = - .13. Individuals who espoused highly idealistic but nonrelativistic personal moral philosophies most strongly endorsed an ethic of caring. Sex differences among these students were conspicuously absent.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Individual differences in information integration during moral judgment.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1985
- Sex Differences in the Development of Moral Reasoning: A Critical ReviewChild Development, 1984
- Ethical ideology and judgments of social psychological research: Multidimensional analysis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1984
- Moral judgment: Theory and research on differences between males and femalesDevelopmental Review, 1983
- 2 PERSPECTIVES - ON SELF, RELATIONSHIPS, AND MORALITYHarvard Educational Review, 1982
- A Reply to Owen Flanagan and Some Comments on the Puka-Goodpaster ExchangeEthics, 1982
- Moral JudgmentPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1981
- A taxonomy of ethical ideologies.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980
- On the ethics of psychological researchJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1977
- Moral conduct and moral character: A psychological perspective.Psychological Bulletin, 1973