Comparative traits of Lactobacillus brevis, Lact. fructivorans and Leuconostoc oenos immobilized cells for the control of malo‐lactic fermentation in wine
- 1 December 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Applied Bacteriology
- Vol. 63 (6) , 513-521
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1987.tb02721.x
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Technological Improvement of Malolactic Fermentation in Wine by Immobilized Microbial Cells in a Continuous Flow ReactoraAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1987
- Improved Stability of ImmobilizedLactobacillussp. Cells for the Control of Malolactic Fermentation in WineAmerican Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 1987
- Growth and Metabolism of Lactic Acid Bacteria during and after Malolactic Fermentation of Wines at Different pHApplied and Environmental Microbiology, 1986
- Practical Implications of Malolactic Fermentation: A ReviewAmerican Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 1985
- Occurrence and Growth of Lactic Acid Bacteria in Wine: A ReviewAmerican Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 1985
- Malolactic Fermentation and Secondary Product Formation in Wine by Leuconostoc oenos Cells Immobilized in a Continuous-flow ReactoraAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1984
- L-Malic Acid Catabolism by Polyacrylamide Gel EntrappedLeuconostoc OenosAmerican Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 1984
- Immobilization ofLeuconostoc Oenosml 34 in Calcium Alginate Gels and its Application to Wine TechnologyAmerican Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 1982
- A new immobilization of microbial cellsApplied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 1979