Should Uncertainty Be Quantified in Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journals Used for Decision-Making?
- 1 March 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal
- Vol. 2 (1) , 11-24
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.1996.10387455
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improving Risk Management by Characterizing Reality: A Benefit of Probabilistic Risk AssessmentHuman and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 1996
- Deterministic Versus Probabilistic Risk Assessment: Strengths and Weaknesses in a Regulatory ContextHuman and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 1996
- Benefits and Costs of Using Probabilistic Techniques in Human Health Risk Assessments—with an Emphasis on Site-Specific Risk AssessmentsHuman and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 1996
- Probabilistic Risk Assessment: Betting on its FutureHuman and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 1996
- Some Thoughts Concerning Quotients, Risks, and Decision-MakingHuman and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 1996
- Choosing fisheries harvest policies: when does uncertainty matter?Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1995
- Correlations, dependency bounds and extinction risksBiological Conservation, 1995
- When and How Can You Specify a Probability Distribution When You Don't Know Much?1Risk Analysis, 1994
- Managing Uncertainty: The Tropospheric Ozone ChallengeRisk Analysis, 1994
- ES&T Series: Cancer Risk Assessment. 5. The Risk Management-risk assessment interfaceEnvironmental Science & Technology, 1988