A comprehensive model for familial breast cancer incorporating BRCA1, BRCA2 and other genes
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 25 January 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in British Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 86 (1) , 76-83
- https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600008
Abstract
In computing the probability that a woman is a BRCA1 or BRCA2 carrier for genetic counselling purposes, it is important to allow for the fact that other breast cancer susceptibility genes may exist. We used data from both a population based series of breast cancer cases and high risk families in the UK, with information on BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status, to investigate the genetic models that can best explain familial breast cancer outside BRCA1 and BRCA2 families. We also evaluated the evidence for risk modifiers in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. We estimated the simultaneous effects of BRCA1, BRCA2, a third hypothetical gene ‘BRCA3’, and a polygenic effect using segregation analysis. The hypergeometric polygenic model was used to approximate polygenic inheritance and the effect of risk modifiers. BRCA1 and BRCA2 could not explain all the observed familial clustering. The best fitting model for the residual familial breast cancer was the polygenic, although a model with a single recessive allele produced a similar fit. There was also significant evidence for a modifying effect of other genes on the risks of breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Under this model, the frequency of BRCA1 was estimated to be 0.051% (95% CI: 0.021–0.125%) and of BRCA2 0.068% (95% CI: 0.033–0.141%). The breast cancer risk by age 70 years, based on the average incidence over all modifiers was estimated to be 35.3% for BRCA1 and 50.3% for BRCA2. The corresponding ovarian cancer risks were 25.9% for BRCA1 and 9.1% for BRCA2. The findings suggest that several common, low penetrance genes with multiplicative effects on risk may account for the residual non-BRCA1/2 familial aggregation of breast cancer. The modifying effect may explain the previously reported differences between population based estimates for BRCA1/2 penetrance and estimates based on high-risk families.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evidence for further breast cancer susceptibility genes in addition to BRCA1 and BRCA2 in a population‐based studyGenetic Epidemiology, 2001
- After BRCA1 and BRCA2—What Next? Multifactorial Segregation Analyses of Three-Generation, Population-Based Australian Families Affected by Female Breast CancerAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 2001
- Hormonal carcinogenesisCarcinogenesis: Integrative Cancer Research, 2000
- Modification of BRCA1-Associated Breast Cancer Risk by the Polymorphic Androgen-Receptor CAG RepeatAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 1999
- Genetic Heterogeneity and Penetrance Analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 Genes in Breast Cancer FamiliesAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 1998
- The Risk of Cancer Associated with Specific Mutations ofBRCA1andBRCA2among Ashkenazi JewsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Localization of the gene for Cowden disease to chromosome 10q22–23Nature Genetics, 1996
- Unusual case of Smith‐Lemli‐Opitz syndrome “type II”American Journal of Medical Genetics, 1995
- Germ Line p53 Mutations in a Familial Syndrome of Breast Cancer, Sarcomas, and Other NeoplasmsScience, 1990
- A new look at the statistical model identificationIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1974