The importance of the lumpectomy surgical margin status in long term results of breast conservation
- 15 July 1995
- Vol. 76 (2) , 259-267
- https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19950715)76:2<259::aid-cncr2820760216>3.0.co;2-2
Abstract
Background. The impact of the surgical margin status on long term local control rates for breast cancer in women treated with lumpectomy and radiation therapy is unclear. Methods. The records of 289 women with 303 invasive breast cancers who were treated with lumpectomy and radiation therapy from 1972 to 1992 were reviewed. The surgical margin was classified as positive (transecting the inked margin), close (less than or equal to 2 mm from the margin), negative, or indeterminate, based on the initial biopsy findings and reexcision specimens, as appropriate. Various clinical and pathologic factors were analyzed as potential prognostic factors for local recurrence in addition to the margin status, including T classification, N classification, age, histologic features, and use of adjuvant therapy. The mean follow-up was 6.25 years. Results. The actuarial probability of freedom from local recurrence for the entire group of patients at 5 and 10 years was 94% and 87%, respectively. The actuarial probability of local control at 10 years was 98% for those patients with negative surgical margins versus 82% for all others (P = 0.007). The local control rate at 10 years was 97% for patients who underwent reexcision and 84% for those who did not. Reexcision appears to convey a local control benefit for those patients with close, indeterminate, or positive initial margins, when negative final margins are attained (P = 0.0001). Final margin status was the most significant determinant of local recurrence rates in univariate analysis. By multivariate analysis, the final margin status and use of adjuvant chemotherapy were significant prognostic factors. Conclusions. The attainment of negative surgical margins, initially or at the time of reexcision, is the most significant predictor of local control after breast-conserving treatment with lumpectomy and radiation therapy. Cancer 1995; 76:259–67.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Breast CancerArchives of Surgery, 1992
- The Optimal Extent of Resection for Patients With Stages I or II Breast Cancer Treated With Conservative Surgery and RadiotherapyAnnals of Surgery, 1991
- Significance of ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence after lumpectomyThe Lancet, 1991
- Quadrantectomy versus lumpectomy for small size breast cancerEuropean Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology, 1990
- The Extent and Distribution of Cancer in Breasts with Palpable Primary TumorsAnnals of Surgery, 1986
- Margins of “Lumpectomy” for breast cancerHuman Pathology, 1986
- Histologic multifocality of tis, T1–2 breast carcinomas implications for clinical trials of breast-conserving surgeryCancer, 1985
- “Residual” mammary carcinoma following simulated partial mastectomyCancer, 1975
- A generalized Wilcoxon test for comparing arbitrarily singly-censored samplesBiometrika, 1965
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958