XENOPUS LAEVIS AND DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Summary: 1. Because of the present popularity of Xenopus laevis for research in developmental biology, a review of the literature on this animal has been undertaken which emphasizes the anatomical, physiological and developmental features in which it differs from other anuran Amphibia. The need for caution in generalizing from observations on Xenopus to other vertebrates is stressed.2. Earlier literature and the use of Xenopus for pregnancy testing have been surveyed briefly. Some of the peculiarities of this genus are: the prevalence of pulmonary rather than cutaneous or branchial respiration in the larva, with concomitant modifications of the vascular system; the larval filter‐feeding mechanism; the unusual development of the forelimbs, outside the gill chamber; and a number of features of musculature and skeleton in the adult which may be regarded either as primitive or as neotenous, or as specializations for aquatic life. Urodele‐like features of the morphology of the pituitary and pineal glands are also mentioned.3. Recent work on the germ cells and their origin in Xenopus is reviewed in Section III. The germ plasm has been traced from early cleavage stages into germ cells whose identity and genetic characteristics may be traced by reciprocal transplants between anucleolate and normal Xenopus. This plasm is thought to contain redundant copies of DNA from the maternal oocyte, which may thus get passed on to the next generation. During oogenesis, yolk proteins originate from maternal liver protein, and both yolk platelets and pigment granules appear to form in association with mitochondria. The yolk platelets evidently contain both DNA and RNA, and the mitochondria also contain both DNA, of a circular form, and ribosomal RNA. In the oocyte nucleus, special interest has been focused recently on the extrachromo‐somal DNA which arises from the nucleolar organizer regions of chromosomes. This DNA later forms the cores of the nucleoli. A number of synthetic processes can take place in the oocyte cytoplasm in the absence of the nucleus, and in the presence of foreign messenger‐RNA. Ribosomal RNA synthesis shows at first an excess of 5 s over 18 s and 28 s forms.4. Spermatogenesis has been studied little in Xenopus. Two unusual features are the absence of seminal vesicles for sperm storage and the spiral shape of the sperm head. By techniques involving destruction of the female pronucleus with ultraviolet light, or suppression of polar‐body formation, androgenetic haploids, as well as triploids and tetraploids, have been produced in this species. Paternal genes begin to act at the onset of gastrulation, when nucleoli appear and major rRNA synthesis begins. This situation is sometimes presumed to typify events in all Amphibia ‐perhaps all vertebrates ‐ but the assumption is unjustified, since in mammals there is much variation in the time of onset of rRNA synthesis, from the evidence so far available.5. During cleavage in Xenopus, which appears to follow the same pattern as in other Amphibia, septate junctions may serve as channels of communication between the cells. Cytoplasmic DNA is a source for the nuclear DNA synthesis, and the total DNA per cell decreases. As shown by nuclear transplantation experiments, cleavage nuclei, like those of later embryonic stages, remain capable of initiating development in an enucleated egg. Egg cytoplasm can also initiate DNA and RNA synthesis in adult nuclei.6. Gastrulation in Xenopus is unusual in that the mesoderm migrates forward below the surface and the dorsal lip is lined superficially by endoderm. Neural inductors have been extracted from the dorsal lip of Xenopus, but have not been analysed biochemically. By the end of gastrulation the induced ectoderm is synthesizing high‐molecular‐weight RNA and also shows increased quantities of three antigenic proteins.7. In the early processes of differentiation of tissue primordia, regional differences in rates of yolk breakdown, proteolysis, amino‐acid activation, tRNA characteristics and rates of incorporation of individual amino acids into protein may be demonstrated. There are also differences in antigens and in isoenzyme patterns. One peculiar morphological feature of early tissue development is the rotatory mode of somite‐formation, not so far seem in any other vertebrate.8. Among several organs whose development has been studied in some detail in Xenopus are: the granular skin glands, which arise from clones of cells; the lateral‐line organs, which persist in the adult and are controlled by sensory and motor nerves; and the epidermal cells, which transmit electrical discharges, probably through their zonulae occludentes. In connexion with the filter feeding, the gut is ciliated in the larva: so also are the pronephric ducts. The growth of the pronephros appears to be controlled by a tissue‐specific ‘chalone’.9. The development of the eye in Xenopus normally entails induction of the lens by the eye‐cup, as in other vertebrates, but independent ‘free lenses’ may form, by aggregation of epidermal cells instead of invagination from a placode, when the eye‐cup rudiment is removed. In the development of the retina there is little evidence of the large‐scale cell death described in other vertebrates. Topographical relations between retina and tectum appear to be established long before the full complement of cells is present in either organ. This and other recent experimental evidence suggests that there are no specific point‐to‐point retinotectal connexions.10. Studies of the development of motor and sensory elements in the spinal cord of Xenopus showed that there were some early sensory cells lying dorsomedially, and also that the proximal regions of the motor roots were orientated longitudinally: both features are unique to Xenopus. As in Urodela, ablation of the limb causes reduction in size of the lumbar motor horns: in Xenopus it has been shown that there is also increased cell death in the sensory ganglia.11. Like other Amphibia, Xenopus can regenerate central nervous system, limbs and the lens of the eye. Limb regeneration is somewhat better than in other Anura but gradually declines with increasing age after metamorphosis and also with increasingly proximal levels of amputation. The lens may regenerate from the cornea, the neural retina or the iris, and the regenerates soon acquire lens antigens.12. Events at metamorphosis in Xenopus are controlled by interactions between the anterior pituitary and the thyroid, as in other Amphibia: cells secreting thyroid‐stimulating hormone and thyroid‐releasing factor have been identified in the anterior lobe. In response to thyroxine, the isolated tail regresses in organ culture, and this regression is accompanied by increases in the activities of lytic enzymes.13. Some physiological features of metamorphosis peculiar to Xenopus are: the continued increase in serum proteins for some time afterwards; the more gradual changes in haemoglobin than in other Anura; and the continued excretion of more ammonia than urea. Under conditions of dehydration, however, carbamyl phosphatase activity in the liver increases and a higher proportion of urea is produced.14. It is concluded that the preferential use of Xenopus for research in developmental biology since the 1950s has led to some important advances in knowledge, but that there is now a need to use other species in order to find out to what extent the same mechanisms operate in them as in Xenopus.