Reversed sexual size dimorphism in microtines: Are females larger than males or are males smaller than females?
- 1 July 1990
- journal article
- conference paper
- Published by Springer Nature in Evolutionary Ecology
- Vol. 4 (3) , 261-272
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02214334
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Demography during a population crash of the wood lemming, Myopus schisticolorCanadian Journal of Zoology, 1988
- Predicting Stable and Cyclic Populations of ClethrionomysOikos, 1988
- Scaling of home range size: Body size, metabolic needs and ecologyTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 1988
- Spatial structuring and dispersal in a high density population of the California vole Microtus californicusEcography, 1987
- Winter energy requirements of soricine shrewsMammal Review, 1987
- Review of winter trophic relations of soricine shrewsMammal Review, 1987
- Sexual dimorphism in body size: Are larger species more dimorphic?Journal of Theoretical Biology, 1986
- On the Evolution of Reproductive Rates in Microtine RodentsEcology, 1985
- Reproductive Effort and Optimal Reproductive Rates in Small RodentsOikos, 1980
- Demographic Mechanisms in the Fluctuating Populations of the Field Vole Microtus agrestisOikos, 1977