Effects of Luminance and Contrast on Direction of Ambiguous Apparent Motion
- 1 April 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Perception
- Vol. 14 (2) , 167-179
- https://doi.org/10.1068/p140167
Abstract
A study is reported of the role of luminance and contrast in resolving ambiguous apparent motion (AM). Different results were obtained for the short-range (SR) and the long-range (LR) motion-detecting processes. For short-range jumps (7.5 min arc), the direction of ambiguous AM depended on brightness polarity, with AM only from white to white and from black to black. But for larger jumps, or when an interstimulus interval (ISI) was introduced, AM was less dependent on polarity, with white often jumping to black and black jumping to white. Two potential AMs were pitted against each other, one carried by a light stimulus and the other by a dark stimulus. The stimulus whose luminance differed most from the uniform surround captured the AM. Visual response to luminance was linear, not logarithmic. When the stimulus was modified to give continuous AM in one direction it was followed by a negative aftereffect of motion only when the spatial displacement was 1 min arc. A larger displacement (10 min arc) gave good AM but no motion aftereffect. Thus only short-range motion adapts motion-sensitive channels.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Low-level and high-level processes in apparent motionPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, 1980
- Apparent Foveofugal Drift of Counterphase GratingsPerception, 1978
- Apparent Motion and the Motion DetectorPublished by Elsevier ,1978
- Motion aftereffect as a function of the contrast of sinusoidal gratingsVision Research, 1976
- A short-range process in apparent motionVision Research, 1974
- Adaptation effects on spatio-temporal sine-wave thresholdsVision Research, 1972
- Discontinuity of seen motion reduces the visual motion aftereffectPerception & Psychophysics, 1972
- Phi movement as a subtraction processVision Research, 1970
- Evidence for a Physiological Explanation of the Waterfall Phenomenon and Figural After-effectsNature, 1963
- Visual Responses to Time-Dependent Stimuli* I Amplitude Sensitivity Measurements†Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1961