Value of image guided fine‐needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of pancreatic malignancies
- 1 August 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Diagnostic Cytopathology
- Vol. 13 (2) , 120-123
- https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.2840130207
Abstract
In the period between 1981–1993, 93 image guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of the pancreas were performed on 63 patients suspected of having a pancreatic carcinoma. From these, 42 patients were subsequently confirmed to have had a pancreatic malignancy by a tissue biopsy. However, FNAC was positive in 29 cases (69.04%) while seven cases (16.66%) were classified as suspicious. In six cases of malignancy (14.28%), cytologically diagnostic material was not sampled using FNAC; hence it was considered that FNAC evaluation gave false negative results in these cases. As a result of this study it was felt that while a cautious approach is necessary in view of certain false negative results, on the whole FNAC was a valuable investigation in the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma with no serious complications in this series. Also, FNAC under imaging assistance is a fairly reliable and safe procedure and the false negative results may be reduced by repeat aspirations especially in cases when insufficient diagnostic material is obtained in a patient clinically suspected of a pancreatic carcinoma.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fine‐needle aspiration biopsy of the pancreas: A study of 61 casesDiagnostic Cytopathology, 1986
- Percutaneous fine‐needle aspiration biopsy of the pancreasDiagnostic Cytopathology, 1986
- Fine needle aspiration biopsy in malignant obstructive jaundiceGastrointestinal Radiology, 1986
- Fine‐needle biopsy of the pancreas: Results of 204 routinely performed biopsies in 190 patientsWorld Journal of Surgery, 1985
- Non-focal enlargement in pancreatic carcinoma.Radiology, 1982
- Cytological diagnosis of pancreatic tumorsWorld Journal of Surgery, 1982
- Percutaneous fine-needle aspiration biopsy. I. Its value to clinical practiceCancer, 1980