Crusaders, sceptics and the nation
- 1 October 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Political Ideologies
- Vol. 3 (3) , 237-253
- https://doi.org/10.1080/13569319808420779
Abstract
Hostility to nationalism is one of the few areas of common ground shared by the crusading liberalism of universal human rights (which is in Oakeshott's terms a variety of ‘the politics of faith') and the sceptical liberalism that concentrates on limited government. Nevertheless, Crusaders and Sceptics alike are more indebted to nationhood than they like to admit. Neither of these versions of liberalism pays explicit attention to the problem of generating the consensual political power it needs, and each tacitly smuggles in nationhood to fill the gap. Sceptical liberals draw on national solidarity to make possible the rule of equal law, while in calling for international humanitarian intervention Crusaders fall back on nation‐states that have a proprietary interest in liberal principles. However, these contingent political connections do not support the liberal nationalist view that liberalism and nationalism can be easily reconciled.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Enlightenment's WakePublished by Taylor & Francis ,2003
- Rethinking Humanitarian InterventionInternational Political Science Review, 1997
- The Permanent Crisis of a Divided Mankind: ‘Contemporary Crisis of the Nation State’ in Historical PerspectivePolitical Studies, 1994
- The Quality of LifePublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1993
- The Legitimation of PowerPublished by Springer Nature ,1991
- Michael Oakeshott as Liberal TheoristPolitical Theory, 1990
- ONE. The Liberalism of FearPublished by Harvard University Press ,1989
- God LandPublished by Harvard University Press ,1988
- What is So Special about Our Fellow Countrymen?Ethics, 1988
- Studies in Philosophy, Politics, and EconomicsPublished by University of Chicago Press ,1967