Phase III Study of Immediate Compared With Delayed Docetaxel After Front-Line Therapy With Gemcitabine Plus Carboplatin in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Top Cited Papers
- 1 February 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 27 (4) , 591-598
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2008.17.1405
Abstract
Purpose Gemcitabine plus carboplatin (GC) is active as front-line treatment for advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). For patients without progression, timing of second-line chemotherapy for optimum clinical benefit remains uncertain. This phase III, randomized trial assessed the efficacy and safety of docetaxel administered either immediately after GC or at disease progression. Patients and Methods The chemotherapy-naïve patients enrolled had either stage IIIB NSCLC with pleural effusion or stage IV NSCLC. Gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2) was administered on days 1 and 8 followed by carboplatin (area under the curve = 5) on day 1. After four 21-day cycles, patients who did not have progression were randomly assigned either to an immediate docetaxel group (docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 1 every 21 days, with maximum of six cycles) or to a delayed docetaxel group. The primary end point was overall survival (OS) measured from random assignment. Additional analyses included tumor response, toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS), and quality of life (QOL). Results Enrollment totaled 566 patients; 398 patients completed GC; 309 patients were randomly assigned equally to the two docetaxel treatment groups. Toxicity profiles were generally comparable for the docetaxel groups. Median PFS for immediate docetaxel (5.7 months) was significantly greater (P = .0001) than for delayed docetaxel (2.7 months). Median OS for immediate docetaxel (12.3 months) was greater than for delayed docetaxel (9.7 months), but the difference was not statistically significant (P = .0853). QOL results were not statistically different (P = .76) between docetaxel groups. Conclusion We observed a statistically significant improvement in PFS and a nonstatistically significant increase in OS when docetaxel was administered immediately after front-line GC, without increasing toxicity or decreasing QOL.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Duration of First-Line Chemotherapy in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Less Is More in the Era of Effective Subsequent TherapiesJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2007
- Optimal Duration of Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung CancerCurrent Treatment Options in Oncology, 2007
- Cancer Statistics, 2007CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2007
- Gemcitabine/Carboplatin in Patients with Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Phase II Study of 28-Day and 21-Day SchedulesClinical Lung Cancer, 2005
- Randomized Phase III Trial of Pemetrexed Versus Docetaxel in Patients With Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Previously Treated With ChemotherapyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- Phase III Randomized Trial Comparing Three Platinum-Based Doublets in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2002
- Comparison of Four Chemotherapy Regimens for Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- A randomized phase III study of gemcitabine and carboplatinum versus vinorelbine and carboplatinum in advanced non small-cells lung cancer (NSCLC)Lung Cancer, 2000
- Randomized Phase III Trial of Docetaxel Versus Vinorelbine or Ifosfamide in Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Previously Treated With Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy RegimensJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2000
- Prospective Randomized Trial of Docetaxel Versus Best Supportive Care in Patients With Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Previously Treated With Platinum-Based ChemotherapyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2000