Freight Distribution Model Predictions Compared: A Comment
- 1 February 1979
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space
- Vol. 11 (2) , 219-221
- https://doi.org/10.1068/a110219
Abstract
A recent paper by Pitfield (1978) concluded from an analysis of freight flows, employing a range of tests, that there was no means of predicting whether a linear-programming solution or a gravity model provided the better approximation to an actual flow matrix. However, it can be shown theoretically that the gravity model should always be at least as good as the linear-programming solution. The source of Pitfield's inconsistent results is traced and it is argued that plural tests should be used to identify specification errors rather than to promote agnosticism.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Freight Distribution Model Predictions Compared: A Test of HypothesesEnvironment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 1978
- Forecasting intercity commodity transport in the U.S.A.Regional Studies, 1974
- The gravity hypothesis and transportation cost minimisation: A commentRegional and Urban Economics, 1974
- The gravity hypothesis and transportation cost minimizationRegional and Urban Economics, 1972
- The calibration of trip distribution models with exponential or similar cost functionsTransportation Research, 1971