Effect of Examinee Group on Equating Relationships
- 1 March 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Applied Psychological Measurement
- Vol. 10 (1) , 35-43
- https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168601000103
Abstract
Many educational tests make use of multiple test forms, which are then horizontally equated to establish interchangeability among forms. To have confidence in this interchangeability, the equating relationships should be robust to the particular group of examinees on which the equating is conducted. This study inves tigated the effects of ability of the examinee group used to establish the equating relationship on linear, equipercentile, and three-parameter logistic IRT esti mated true score equating methods. The results show all of the methods to be reasonably independent of ex aminee group, and suggest that population independ ence is not a good reason for selecting one method over another.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Standard Errors of Equipercentile Equating for the Common Item Nonequivalent Populations DesignJournal of Educational Statistics, 1985
- Comparison of IRT True-Score and Equipercentile Observed-Score "Equatings"Applied Psychological Measurement, 1984
- Effectiveness of Analytic Smoothing in Equipercentile EquatingJournal of Educational Statistics, 1984
- COMPARISON OF FOUR PROCEDURES FOR EQUATING THE TESTS OF GENERAL EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENTJournal of Educational Measurement, 1982
- The Standard Error of Equipercentile EquatingJournal of Educational Statistics, 1982
- The Standard Error of Equipercentile EquatingJournal of Educational Statistics, 1982
- The Rasch Model, Objective Measurement, Equating, and RobustnessApplied Psychological Measurement, 1979
- AN EXPLORATION OF THE ADEQUACY OF THE RASCH MODEL FOR THE PROBLEM OF VERTICAL EQUATINGJournal of Educational Measurement, 1978
- LATENT TRAIT MODELS AND THEIR USE IN THE ANALYSIS OF EDUCATIONAL TEST DATA1,2,3Journal of Educational Measurement, 1977
- VERTICALLY EQUATED TESTS: FACT OR PHANTOM?*Journal of Educational Measurement, 1977