BALANCING THE RIGHT TO HABILITATION WITH THE RIGHT TO PERSONAL LIBERTIES: THE RIGHTS OF PEOPLE WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES TO EAT TOO MANY DOUGHNUTS AND TAKE A NAP
- 1 March 1990
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
- Vol. 23 (1) , 79-89
- https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1990.23-79
Abstract
In the pursuit of efficient habilitation, many service providers exercise a great deal of control over the lives of clients with developmental disabilities. For example, service providers often choose the client's habilitative goals, determine the daily schedule, and regulate access to preferred activities. This paper examines the advantages and disadvantages of allowing clients to exercise personal liberties, such as the right to choose and refuse daily activities. On one hand, poor choices on the part of the client could hinder habilitation. On the other hand, moral and legal issues arise when the client's right to choice is abridged. Recommendations are offered to protect both the right to habilitation and the freedom to choose.Keywords
This publication has 55 references indexed in Scilit:
- Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health.Psychological Bulletin, 1988
- Developing independenceJournal of Adolescent Health Care, 1985
- Children's Artistic CreativityPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1984
- Perceived controlMotivation and Emotion, 1980
- Changing a frightening toy into a pleasant toy by allowing the infant to control its actions.Developmental Psychology, 1978
- The illusion of control.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975
- The function of the illusions of control and freedom.American Psychologist, 1973
- Effects of coping behavior in different warning signal conditions on stress pathology in rats.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1971
- Reduction of stress in humans through nonveridical perceived control of aversive stimulation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970
- Perceived control, self-observation, and response to aversive stimulation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970