Abstract
Steve Fuller's Social Epistemology offers a constructive program for integrating philosophy and sociology of science as normative knowledge policy, constrained by the linguistic, psychological, social, and political embodiment of knowledge. I endorse and elaborate upon Fuller's insistence that science studies should take seriously the embodiment of knowledge, but criticize his conception of knowledge policy on three grounds. Knowledge policy as Fuller conceives it seems committed to an untenable conception of a value‐free or politically neutral social science. Knowledge policy studies are also self‐defeating, since they provide good reasons to ignore the recommendations of the knowledge‐policy expert, and to prevent the successful development of a predictively adequate policy science. Finally, knowledge‐policy studies cannot adequately respond to political conflict over knowledge production and dissemination.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: