Effect of mode of delivery on incidence of respiratory distress syndrome
- 1 October 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
- Vol. 27 (2) , 165-170
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7292(88)90002-1
Abstract
The effect of route of delivery on incidence of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) has been controversial. While some investigators have reported no difference in RDS rates in infants born by cesarean section as compared to vaginal delivery, others have shown a significant increase in risk for RDS among infants born by cesarean section. Data from the 297 patients comprising the placebo group in the recently completed collaborative study of antenatal steroid therapy in the prevention of neonatal RDS, were analyzed to determine the effect of mode of delivery on RDS. The results indicate that infants born by cesarean section without labor have a higher risk for neonatal RDS than infants born vaginally or by cesarean section after a trial of labor.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- AN INVESTIGATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CESAREAN SECTION BIRTH AND RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME OF THE NEWBORNAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1985
- An old problem revisited-hyaline membrane disease and cesarean sectionEuropean Journal of Pediatrics, 1982
- Effect of antenatal dexamethasone administration on the prevention of respiratory distress syndrome**See Editorial Comment following this article.American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1981
- PLANNED VAGINAL DELIVERY FOLLOWING CESAREAN SECTIONClinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1980
- The effect of cesarean section on respiratory distress in the presence of a mature lecithin/sphingomyelin ratioAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1973
- Risk of respiratory distress syndrome related to gestational age, route of delivery, and maternal diabetesAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1971
- Respiratory distress syndrome in infants delivered by cesarean sectionAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1964