Effects of miscuing on pavlovian conditioned responding and on probe reaction time
- 1 December 1993
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Australian Journal of Psychology
- Vol. 45 (3) , 161-167
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00049539308259134
Abstract
Two experiments examined the effect of the miscuing of an unconditioned stimulus on Pavlovian conditioned responding. In Experiment 1 (N = 32), subjects received 12 CS+—US and 12 CS− presentations followed, in the experimental group, by a CS−—US pairing (miscuing) on Trial 25 and a CS+US pairing on Trial 26. For the control group, Trial 25 consisted of a CS—alone presentation and Trial 26 consisted of a (CS+—US pairing. Visual stimuli (geometric shapes) of 8‐s duration served as CSs, and a 1‐s burst of white noise (100 dBA) was used as the US. Both electrodermal activity and a continuous measure of US expectancy were obtained. Expectancy of the US was significantly lower in the experimental group than in the control on the W‐US trial which followed miscuing, whereas electrodermal responses to the US were significantly larger. However, first‐ and second‐interval responses during cs+ on this trial were not influenced by miscuing. Experiment 2 (N = 64) employed the same stimuli and procedures as used in Experiment 1, but the dependent measure was reaction time to a probe stimulus presented either early (300 ms) or late (7500 ms) during some CSs+ and some CSs−. During the acquisition phase, probe reaction time was slower during CS+ than during CS regardless of probe position. Moreover, reaction time to probes presented during CS+ on the trial which followed miscuing was slower in the experimental group than in the control irrespective of probe position. Although not all findings were as predicted, the present results suggest that a CSUS pairing disrupted the association between CS+ and the US. This effect of US miscuing is difficult to interpret within the framework of current theories of Pavlovian Conditioning.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Orienting, Habituation, and Resource Allocation: An Associative AnalysisPsychophysiology, 1991
- Associative structure of differential inhibition: Implications for models of conditioned inhibition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1991
- Excitation and inhibition as a function of posttraining extinction of the excitatory cue used in Pavlovian inhibition trainingLearning and Motivation, 1990
- Latent Inhibition and Conditioned Attention TheoryPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1989
- Stimulus Miscuing, Electrodermal Activity, and the Allocation of Processing ResourcesPsychophysiology, 1989
- The Comparator Hypothesis: A Response Rule for The Expression of AssociationsPublished by Elsevier ,1988
- Effects of stimulus omission and stimulus change on dishabituation of the skin conductance response.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1985
- Allocation of cognitive processing capacity during human autonomic classical conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1982
- A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli.Psychological Review, 1980
- Inhibition of the unconditioned response in classical conditioning.Psychological Review, 1966