The public health relevance of air pollution abatement
- 1 July 2002
- journal article
- review article
- Published by European Respiratory Society (ERS) in European Respiratory Journal
- Vol. 20 (1) , 198-209
- https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.02.00401502
Abstract
Assuming a causal relationship between current levels of air pollution and morbidity/mortality, it is crucial to estimate the public health relevance of the problem. The derivation of air pollution attributable cases faces inherent uncertainties and requires influential assumptions. Based on the results of the trinational impact assessment study of Austria, France, and Switzerland, where prudent estimates of the air pollution attributable cases (mortality, chronic bronchitis incidence, hospital admissions, acute bronchitis among children, restricted activity days, asthma attacks) have been made, influential uncertainties are quantified in this review.The public health impact of smoking, environmental tobacco smoke, and air pollution on the prevalence of chronic cough/phlegm are outlined. Despite all methodological caveats, impact assessment studies clearly suggest that public health largely benefits from better air quality. The studies are selective underestimates as they are strongly driven by mortality, but do not include full quantification of the impact on morbidity and their consequences on quality of life among the diseased and the caregivers.Air pollution abatement strategies are usually political in nature, targeting at policies, regulation and technology in mobile or stationary sources rather than at individuals. It is of note that key clean air strategies converge into abatement of climate change. In general, energy consumption is very closely related to both air pollution and greenhouse gases. The dominant causes of both problems are the excessive and inefficient combustion of fossil fuel. Thus, for many policy options, the benefit of air pollution abatement will go far beyond what prudent health-impact assessments may derive. From a climate change and air pollution perspective, improved energy efficiency and a strong and decisive departure from the “fossil fuel” combustion society is a science-based must. Health professionals must raise their voices in the political decision process to give strong support for clean air policies, both on a national and international level.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessment of Deaths Attributable to Air Pollution: Should We Use Risk Estimates based on Time Series or on Cohort Studies?American Journal of Epidemiology, 2001
- Fine Particulate Air Pollution and Mortality in 20 U.S. Cities, 1987–1994New England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Public-health impact of outdoor and traffic-related air pollution: a European assessmentThe Lancet, 2000
- Evidence Mounts That Tiny Particles Can KillScience, 2000
- Short term effects of ambient sulphur dioxide and particulate matter on mortality in 12 European cities: results from time series data from the APHEA projectBMJ, 1997
- Lung function and long term exposure to air pollutants in Switzerland. Study on Air Pollution and Lung Diseases in Adults (SAPALDIA) Team.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1997
- Public health methods--attributable risk as a link between causality and public health action.American Journal of Public Health, 1995
- Epidemiology Faces Its LimitsPublished by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) ,1995
- Passive smoking exposure in adults and chronic respiratory symptoms (SAPALDIA Study). Swiss Study on Air Pollution and Lung Diseases in Adults, SAPALDIA Team.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1994
- Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear modelsBiometrika, 1986