Ethics and scientific publication
Top Cited Papers
- 1 June 2005
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Physiological Society in Advances in Physiology Education
- Vol. 29 (2) , 59-74
- https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00056.2004
Abstract
This article summarizes the major categories of ethical violations encountered during submission, review, and publication of scientific articles. We discuss data fabrication and falsification, plagiarism, redundant and duplicate publication, conflict of interest, authorship, animal and human welfare, and reviewer responsibility. In each section, pertinent historical background and citation of relevant regulations and statutes are provided. Furthermore, a specific case(s) derived from actual situations is(are) presented. These cases were chosen to highlight the complexities that investigators and journals must face when dealing with ethical issues. A series of discussion questions follow each case. It is our hope that by increasing education and awareness of ethical matters relevant to scientific investigation and publication, deviations from appropriate conduct will be reduced.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Plagiarism in Cambridge physics lab prompts calls for guidelinesNature, 2004
- HOW TO REVIEW A PAPERAdvances in Physiology Education, 2003
- Scope and Impact of Financial Conflicts of Interest in Biomedical ResearchJAMA, 2003
- Sitting in judgementNature, 2002
- Guiding principles for research involving animals and human beingsAmerican Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, 2002
- Financial Associations of AuthorsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Sponsorship, Authorship, and AccountabilityNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Is Academic Medicine for Sale?New England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Editorial: Redundant publicationCatheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis, 1997
- Now what?American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology, 1993