Histamine-2-Receptor Antagonists and Antacids in the Critically Ill Population Stress Ulceration Versus Nosocomial Pneumonia
- 1 July 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
- Vol. 15 (7) , 437-442
- https://doi.org/10.1086/646948
Abstract
We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate whether stress ulcer prophylaxis with histamine-2-receptor antagonists or antacids reduces mortality in critically ill patients. It appears that sucralfate results in a lower incidence of nosocomial pneumonia than either antacids or histamine-2-receptor antagonists. With respect to mortality, strong trends favored sucralfate over both antacids and histamine-receptor antagonists.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Stress ulcer prophylaxis in the critically III: A meta-analysisThe American Journal of Medicine, 1991
- The gastropulmonary route of infection—Fact or fiction?The American Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in long-term ventilated patientsThe American Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Colonization and infection in surgical intensive care patients ?a prospective studyIntensive Care Medicine, 1987
- Upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding acquired in a pediatric intensive care unit: Prophylaxis trial with cimetidineThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1986
- Comparison of antacid and sucralfate in the prevention of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients who are critically IIIThe American Journal of Medicine, 1985
- Antacid versus sucralfate in preventing acute gastrointestinal bleedingThe American Journal of Surgery, 1984
- Cimetidine vs Antacid in Prophylaxis for Stress UlcerationArchives of Surgery, 1981
- Cimetidine and antacid prophylaxis of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in high risk patientsThe American Journal of Surgery, 1981
- Aspiration pneumoniaThe American Journal of Surgery, 1976