Putting Program Theory into Operation
- 1 June 1999
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in American Journal of Evaluation
- Vol. 20 (2) , 227-238
- https://doi.org/10.1177/109821409902000205
Abstract
The emphasis on understanding how a program works and what makes a program work led to the development of the theory-driven approach to program evaluation. Theory plays a major role in guiding a program design and evaluation. The theory defines the presenting problem and the target population for whom the program is designed, specifies the causal processes underlying the program effects, and identifies its expected outcomes as well as factors that affect treatment processes. In this article, a conceptual framework is presented as a tool for putting the program theory into operation. The framework incorporates variables that reflect theoretical concepts and implementation issues addressed in program evaluation. The framework organizes the variables into three categories: input, process, and output, and proposes direct and indirect relationships among them. Implications of the framework for program evaluation are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Confirmatory Program Evaluation: A Method for Strengthening Causal InferenceAmerican Journal of Evaluation, 1998
- A quasi‐sampling theory of the generalization of causal relationshipsNew Directions for Program Evaluation, 1993
- Assessing Early Intervention Outcomes: Beyond Program VariablesInternational Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 1991
- Measuring implementation of social treatmentNew Directions for Program Evaluation, 1988
- Pattern Matching, Validity, and Conceptualization in Program EvaluationEvaluation Review, 1985
- Improving Established Statewide ProgramsEvaluation Review, 1985
- Assessing Treatment Implementation Amid the Slings and Arrows of RealityEvaluation Review, 1984
- Treatment Implementation and Statistical PowerEvaluation Review, 1982
- Critical dimensions in the choice and maintenance of successful treatments: Strength, integrity, and effectiveness.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1981
- THE USE OF EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN IN EDUCATIONAL EVALUATIONJournal of Educational Measurement, 1971