Controversies in liver biopsy: Who, where, when, how, why?
- 1 January 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Current Gastroenterology Reports
- Vol. 6 (1) , 30-36
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-004-0023-4
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 68 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pathologist's perspective on liver needle biopsy size?Journal of Hepatology, 2003
- Transjugular Biopsy of the Liver in Pediatric and Adult Patients Using an 18-Gauge Automated Core Biopsy Needle: A Retrospective Review of 410 Consecutive ProceduresAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2003
- Evaluation of Abnormal Liver-Enzyme Results in Asymptomatic PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Cost-effectiveness of ultrasound-guided liver biopsyHepatology, 1998
- Variation between centers in technique and guidelines for liver biopsyLiver International, 1996
- Midazolam sedation for percutaneous liver biopsyDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 1993
- A randomized trial of ultrasound-guided anterior subcostal liver biopsy versus the conventional Menghini techniqueJournal of Hepatology, 1991
- Complications following percutaneous liver biopsyJournal of Hepatology, 1986
- Percutaneous blind biopsy versus laparoscopy with guided biopsy in diagnosis of cirrhosisDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 1983
- Bleeding after liver biopsy does not correlate with indices of peripheral coagulationDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 1981