Abstract
This article looks at the effect that damage caps have on plaintiffs' recovery in medical malpractice litigation, using a unique data set of litigation in the South, from 1987 to 1999. During this time, Alabama underwent both the implementation and nullification of damage‐cap laws; neighboring states did not undergo any significant legal changes. The product of a difference‐in‐difference approach, the results reveal that the average relative recovery by Alabama plaintiffs decreased by roughly $20,000 after the Alabama legislature enacted damage caps and increased by roughly double that amount after the Alabama Supreme Court ruled them unconstitutional.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: