A phase II study of a paclitaxel and oxaliplatin combination in platinum-sensitive recurrent advanced ovarian cancer patients
Open Access
- 1 March 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Annals of Oncology
- Vol. 17 (3) , 429-436
- https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdj097
Abstract
Purpose: A multicentric, phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination paclitaxel and oxaliplatin in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. Patients and methods: Patients received 175 mg/m2 paclitaxel (over 3 h) followed by 130 mg/m2 oxaliplatin (over 2 h) every 21 days for up to nine cycles without hydration or primary granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis. Patients had to have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–2 and to have received no more than one prior cisplatin- and/or carboplatin-containing chemotherapy regimen with a platinum-progression-free interval ≥6 months. Results: Of the 105 patients enrolled and treated, 98 were eligible. An overall response rate of 81% (79 of 98 patients) (95% confidence interval 71% to 88%) was observed according to RECIST criteria (third party reviewed), and 88% (86 of 98) when this was complemented with CA-125 response. With a median follow up of 43.6 months (range 30.2–64.2) the median progression-free survival was 10.2 months (range 0.3–21.4) and the overall survival 32.4 months. Seven hundred and eight cycles were administered (median seven per patient; range one to nine). A total of 67% of patients experienced National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3–4 neutropenia, including 8% with concomitant febrile episode, without treatment-related deaths. Ninety-three per cent of patients experienced neuropathy of grade 1 or more, including 25% with cumulative reversible peripheral neuropathy of grade 3–4. Oxaliplatin doses were reduced in 30 patients due to neurotoxicity. Conclusions: The oxaliplatin/paclitaxel combination can be administered in an outpatient setting every 3 weeks without specific measures. The high level of activity and its duration observed warrants further evaluation of this combination in pretreated platinum-sensitive advanced ovarian cancer patients.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Should CA-125 Response Criteria Be Preferred to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) for Prognostication During Second-Line Chemotherapy of Ovarian Carcinoma?Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- Cancer Statistics, 2003CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2003
- Retrospective Analysis of Carboplatin and Paclitaxel as Initial Second-Line Therapy for Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma: Application Toward a Dynamic Disease State Model of Ovarian CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2002
- Carboplatin Alone vs Carboplatin plus Epidoxorubicin as Second-Line Therapy for Cisplatin- or Carboplatin-Sensitive Ovarian CancerGynecologic Oncology, 2001
- New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid TumorsJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2000
- hMLH1 expression and cellular responses of ovarian tumour cells to treatment with cytotoxic anticancer agentsOncogene, 1997
- Oxaliplatin, tetraplatin, cisplatin, and carboplatin: Spectrum of activity in drug-resistant cell lines and in the cell lines of the national cancer institute's anticancer drug screen panelBiochemical Pharmacology, 1996
- Cyclophosphamide and Cisplatin Compared with Paclitaxel and Cisplatin in Patients with Stage III and Stage IV Ovarian CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- A chronopharmacologic phase II clinical trial with 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid, and oxaliplatin using an ambulatory multichannel programmable pump. High antitumor effectiveness against metastatic colorectal cancerCancer, 1992
- Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1989