Development, Evolution, and Adaptation
- 1 January 2000
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Philosophy of Science
- Vol. 67 (S3) , S369-S387
- https://doi.org/10.1086/392832
Abstract
In this paper I develop three conceptions of the relationship between evolutionary and developmental biology. I further argue that: (a) the choice between them largely turns on as yet unresolved empirical considerations; (b) none of these conceptions demand a fundamental conceptual reevaluation of evolutionary biology; and (c) while developmental systems theorists have constructed an important and innovative alternative to the standard view of the genotype/phenotype relations, in considering the general issue of the relationship between evolutionary and developmental biology, we can remain neutral on this debate.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- The extended replicatorBiology & Philosophy, 1996
- Resynthesizing Evolutionary and Developmental BiologyDevelopmental Biology, 1996
- Homology,HoxGenes, and Developmental IntegrationAmerican Zoologist, 1996
- Two Concepts of Constraint: Adaptationism and the Challenge from Developmental BiologyPhilosophy of Science, 1994
- Developmental Systems and Evolutionary ExplanationThe Journal of Philosophy, 1994
- Arguments, tests, and the Burgess Shale — a commentary on the debatePaleobiology, 1993
- Analysis of the Burgess ShalePaleobiology, 1993
- Death of the Gene: Developmental Systems Strike BackPublished by Springer Nature ,1992
- The disparity of the Burgess Shale arthropod fauna and the limits of cladistic analysis: why we must strive to quantify morphospacePaleobiology, 1991
- The persistence of dichotomies in the study of behavioral developmentDevelopmental Review, 1987