Compatibility of a nonthoracotomy lead system with a biphasic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator

This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:

• Arrhythmias after cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: Comparison of epicardial and transvenous systems
  The American Journal of Cardiology, 1995
• Nonthoracotomy- versus thoracotomy-implantable defibrillators. Intention-to-treat comparison of clinical outcomes.
  Circulation, 1994
• Preliminary experience with a hybrid nonthoracotomy defibrillating system that includes a biphasic device: Comparison with a standard monophasic device using the same lead system
  Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1994
• Clinical outcome of patients with malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias and a multiprogrammable implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implanted with or without thoracotomy: An international multicenter study
  Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1994
• Determinats of successful nonthoracotomy cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: Experience in 101 patients using two different lead systems
  Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1993
• Comparison of biphasic and monophasic shocks for defibrillation using a nonthoracotomy system
  The American Journal of Cardiology, 1993
• Defibrillation Thresholds and Perioperative Mortality Associated with Endocardial and Epicardial Defihrillation Lead Systems
  Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1993
• Improved internal defibrillation efficacy with a biphasic waveform
  American Heart Journal, 1989
• Improved low energy defibrillation efficacy in man with the use of a biphasic truncated exponential waveform
  American Heart Journal, 1989
• Comparative efficacy of monophasic and biphasic truncated exponential shocks for nonthoracotomy internal defibrillation in dogs
  Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1988