Project alliancing vs project partnering: a case study of the Australian National Museum Project
- 1 May 2002
- journal article
- Published by Emerald Publishing in Supply Chain Management: An International Journal
- Vol. 7 (2) , 83-91
- https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540210425830
Abstract
Significant differences between project partnering and project alliancing occur in the selection process, management structure of the organisations undertaking the project and nature of risk and reward incentives. This paper helps clarify the nature of project alliancing and how alliance member organisations were selected for this case study. A core issue that differentiates between the two approaches is that in partnering, partners may reap rewards at the expense of other partners. In alliancing each alliance member places their profit margin and reward structure “at risk”. Thus in alliancing, the entire alliance entity either benefits together or not all. This fundamentally changes the motivation and dynamics of the relationship between alliance members.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Building partnerships: case studies of clientcontractor collaboration in the UK construction industryConstruction Management and Economics, 2000
- Motivation, commitment and the use of incentives in partnerships and alliancesConstruction Management and Economics, 2000
- Project Partnering: Improving the Likelihood of Win/Win OutcomesJournal of Management in Engineering, 2000
- Partnering in construction: a critical review of issues, problems and dilemmasConstruction Management and Economics, 2000
- PEER-REVIEWED PAPER: Partnering ContinuumJournal of Management in Engineering, 1998
- The State of the Construction IndustryPublished by American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) ,1996
- Project Partnering: Results of Study of 280 Construction ProjectsJournal of Management in Engineering, 1995
- Partnering‐Project Performance in U.S. Army Corps of EngineersJournal of Management in Engineering, 1993