Why do females care more than males?
- 22 November 1997
- journal article
- Published by The Royal Society in Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
- Vol. 264 (1388) , 1555-1557
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1997.0216
Abstract
Females tend to provide more parental care than males. Previous efforts to account for this have been confused because it is difficult to express the costs of care for males and females in the same currency. Here I propose a null model that does so, using the Fisherian constraint that total male and female reproduction must be equal. The model shows that, contrary to a number of recent analyses, lower probability of parentage for males does tend to make males less likely than females to provide care. It also shows how sexual selection stemming from premating asymmetries in investment promotes similar post–mating asymmetries.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Indiscriminate altruism: unduly nice parents and siblingsTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 1997
- Parentage and the evolution of parental behaviorBehavioral Ecology, 1993
- Potential Reproductive Rates and the Operation of Sexual SelectionThe Quarterly Review of Biology, 1992
- Chance can produce a sex difference in variance in mating success and explain Bateman's dataAnimal Behaviour, 1985
- Opportunity cost, benefit and degree of relatednessAnimal Behaviour, 1980
- Paternity and the evolution of male parental careJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1980
- ON THE ORIGIN AND BASIS OF THE MALE-FEMALE PHENOMENONPublished by Elsevier ,1979
- The origin and evolution of gamete dimorphism and the male-female phenomenonJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1972
- Intra-sexual selection in DrosophilaHeredity, 1948
- The genetical theory of natural selectionPublished by Biodiversity Heritage Library ,1930