Explaining the Race Difference in Prostate Cancer Stage at Diagnosis
Open Access
- 1 October 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
- Vol. 17 (10) , 2825-2834
- https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-08-0203
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in males in the United States, accounting for an estimated 186,320 new cases in 2008. There are striking racial or ethnic differences in prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates in the United States, with Black males 1.6 times more likely to be diagnosed and 2.4 times more likely to die with prostate cancer than Whites. Stage at diagnosis is a key prognostic factor for prostate cancer survival, with African-Americans generally diagnosed at a more advanced stage. To identify factors that explain the race-stage disparity in prostate cancer, we conducted a population-based case-case study of 251 African-American (46%) and White (54%) prostate cancer cases diagnosed in Connecticut between January 1987 and October 1990. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify potential explanatory factors, including clinical, sociodemographic, medical care, insurance, digital rectal examination screening history, and lifestyle factors. Cox proportional hazards models assessed the impact of study variables on race differences in long-term survival. Modifiable factors such as screening practice and sociodemographic factors accounted for >60% of the race difference in prostate cancer stage at diagnosis. Histologic grade (Gleason score) accounted for comparatively less. Survival analyses confirmed the importance of tumor characteristics, education, and insurance in explaining observed race differences in survival. Although cases were identified before the widespread use of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening, the results should also be relevant to countries that have large underserved populations and/or disparities in access to medical care and cancer screening. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17(10):2825–34)This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cancer Statistics, 2008CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2008
- Risk factors for prostate cancer incidence and progression in the health professionals follow‐up studyInternational Journal of Cancer, 2007
- Adequacy of Communicating Results From Screening Mammograms to African American and White WomenAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2007
- Inadequate Follow-up of Abnormal Screening Mammograms: Findings From the Race Differences in Screening Mammography Process Study (United States)Cancer Causes & Control, 2005
- Prostate‐specific antigen: A review of the validation of the most commonly used cancer biomarkerCancer, 2004
- Mammography screening in African American womenCancer, 2002
- A Prospective Study of Tomato Products, Lycopene, and Prostate Cancer RiskJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2002
- DIETARY FAT AND ADVANCED PROSTATE CANCERJournal of Urology, 1998
- A Prospective Study of Dietary Fat and Risk of Prostate CancerJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1993
- A revised socioeconomic index of occupational statusSocial Science Research, 1981