National Attitudes on the Far Eastern Controversy
- 1 August 1933
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 27 (4) , 555-576
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1947564
Abstract
Students of international relations are concerned with the description, prediction, and control of the external behavior of states, particularly of their more violent types of behavior such as intervention, hostilities, and war. It is clear that mere description of a diplomatic or military event has little meaning by itself and that such an event can neither be predicted nor controlled unless account is taken of the circumstances which preceded it within each of the states involved. Among the internal circumstances which have been studied are the correspondence of statesmen, the declarations of legislatures, executives, foreign offices, and political parties, the prescriptions of constitutional law and procedure, the traditional policies manifested by the history of the state, and the understandings of treaty and international law accepted by the community of nations at the time and presumably by the states involved.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Experimental Social PsychologyThe American Journal of Psychology, 1934
- Methods for measuring attitudes.Psychological Bulletin, 1932
- The measurement of social attitudes.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1931
- Rank order as a psycho-physical method.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1931
- Theory of attitude measurement.Psychological Review, 1929
- An Experimental Study of Nationality PReferencesThe Journal of General Psychology, 1928
- Attitudes Can Be MeasuredAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1928
- The method of paired comparisons for social values.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1927
- Differential changes of political preference under campaign stimulation.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1926
- The Measurement and Motivation of Atypical Opinion in a Certain GroupAmerican Political Science Review, 1925