Associations between Smoking, Polymorphisms in Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon (PAH) Metabolism and Conjugation Genes and PAH-DNA Adducts in Prostate Tumors Differ by Race

Open Access
Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)-DNA adducts may induce mutations that contribute to carcinogenesis. We evaluated potential associations between smoking and polymorphisms in PAH metabolism [CYP1A1 Ile462Val, CYP1B1 Ala119Ser and Leu432Val, microsomal epoxide hydrolase (mEH) Tyr113His and His139Arg, CYP3A4 A(−392)G] and conjugation [glutathione S-transferase (GST) M1 null deletion, GSTP1 Ile105Val] genes and PAH-DNA adduct levels (measured by immunohistochemistry) in tumor and nontumor prostate cells in 400 prostate cancer cases. Although no statistically significant associations were observed in the total sample, stratification by ethnicity revealed that Caucasian ever smokers compared with nonsmokers had higher adduct levels in tumor cells (mean staining intensity in absorbance units ± SE, 0.1748 ± 0.0052 versus 0.1507 ± 0.0070; P = 0.006), and Caucasians carrying two mEH 139Arg compared with two 139His alleles had lower adducts in tumor (0.1320 ± 0.0129 versus 0.1714 ± 0.0059; P = 0.006) and nontumor (0.1856 ± 0.0184 versus 0.2291 ± 0.0085; P = 0.03) cells. African Americans with two CYP1B1 432Val compared with two 432Ile alleles had lower adducts in tumor cells (0.1600 ± 0.0060 versus 0.1970 ± 0.0153; P = 0.03). After adjusting for smoking status, carrying the putative “high-risk” genotype combination, the faster metabolism of PAH-epoxides to PAH-diol-epoxides (CYP1B1 432Val/Val and mEH 139Arg/Arg) with lower PAH-diol-epoxide conjugation (GSTP1 105Ile/Ile), was associated with increased adducts only in Caucasian nontumor cells (0.2363 ± 0.0132 versus 0.1920 ± 0.0157; P= 0.05). We present evidence, for the first time in human prostate that the association between smoking and PAH-DNA adducts differs by race and is modified by common genetic variants. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16(6):1236–45)