Width of Keratinized Tissue After Gingivoplasty of Healed Subepithelial Connective Tissue Grafts
- 1 November 2000
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Periodontology
- Vol. 71 (11) , 1729-1736
- https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.71.11.1729
Abstract
Background: The subepithelial connective tissue graft has markedly broadened clinicians' abilities to treat gingival recession. Frequently, however, bulky soft tissue contours are sequelae of this procedure, and post‐healing gingivoplasty is often performed to improve esthetics of the grafted site. As a secondary benefit, it is believed that the zone of keratinized tissue is additionally increased after gingivoplasty.Methods: To further investigate this clinical impression, 16 bilateral pairs of sites with recession in 6 consecutive patients (mean age = 38 ± 9 years) were studied. At the time of initial grafting, one site in each pair was randomly assigned to receive either gingivoplasty 2 months later (GP+) or no further treatment (GP‐). Clinical measurement of recession and keratinized tissue width was standardized using customized acrylic stents and Schiller iodine solution, which stains epithelia; values were recorded at baseline (day of graft) and at 2, 3, and 5 months after grafting. Mean clinical gingival widths over time between GP+ and GP‐ sites, as well as within GP+ sites, were analyzed by t test.Results: At 5 months, both the GP+ and GP‐ sites demonstrated a mean root coverage of 87.4% and increased keratinized tissue width (1.2 mm) when compared to their respective baseline measures. No differences in recession depth and width of keratinized tissue were seen at 5 months between the GP+ and GP− groups. In addition, no differences in recession or gingival width were found between 2‐ and 5‐month observations for either the GP+ or GP‐ groups.Conclusions: These data suggest that the observed clinical improvements are the outcome of the initial graft surgery and that the gingivoplasty procedure does not result in additional (or “rebound”) increases in keratinized tissue width. J Periodontol 2000;71:1729‐1736.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Treatment of Gingival Recession With Titanium Reinforced Barrier Membranes Versus Connective Tissue GraftsThe Journal of Periodontology, 1998
- Subepithelial Connective Tissue Grafts in the Treatment of Gingival Recessions. A Comparative Study of 2 ProceduresThe Journal of Periodontology, 1994
- The Connective Tissue With Partial Thickness Double Pedicle Graft: The Results of 100 Consecutively‐Treated DefectsThe Journal of Periodontology, 1994
- Thick Free Gingival and Connective Tissue Autografts for Root CoverageThe Journal of Periodontology, 1993
- Re‐epithelialization of a palatal connective tissue graft transplanted in a non‐keratinized alveolar mucosa: A histological and biochemical study in humansJournal of Periodontal Research, 1988
- Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft Technique for Root CoverageThe Journal of Periodontology, 1985
- Regeneration of Organized Epithelial StructureJournal of Investigative Dermatology, 1983
- The role of gingival connective tissue in determining epithelial differentiationJournal of Periodontal Research, 1975
- Periodontal Disease in Pregnancy I. Prevalence and SeverityActa Odontologica Scandinavica, 1963