The Use of Pledges to Build and Sustain Commitment in Distribution Channels
Open Access
- 1 February 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Marketing Research
- Vol. 29 (1) , 18-34
- https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379202900103
Abstract
Commitment in channel relationships is modeled as a function of (1) each party's perception of the other party's commitment, (2) self-reported and perceived pledges (idiosyncratic investments and contractual terms) made by each party, and (3) other factors such as communication level, reputation, and relationship history. A dyadic model represented by a simultaneous equation system is estimated with data from 378 pairs of manufacturers and industrial distributors. The results indicate that one type of pledge, idiosyncratic investments, has a strong effect on the commitment of both parties to the relationship. In addition, each party's commitment is affected by the perceived commitment of the other party. Finally, idiosyncratic investments signal commitment, affecting each party's perceptions of the other party's commitment.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hybrid Organizational Arrangements: New Form or Transitional Development?California Management Review, 1987
- Perceived organizational support.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1986
- Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1986
- The Role of Market Forces in Assuring Contractual PerformanceJournal of Political Economy, 1981
- Markets, Bureaucracies, and ClansAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1980
- A Theory of Self-Enforcing AgreementsThe Journal of Business, 1980
- Non-Contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary StudyAmerican Sociological Review, 1963
- Notes on the Concept of CommitmentAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1960
- The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary StatementAmerican Sociological Review, 1960
- The Informant in Quantitative ResearchAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1955