Matrilateral biases in the investment of aunts and uncles
- 1 June 1997
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Human Nature
- Vol. 8 (2) , 139-151
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-997-1008-4
Abstract
In a study of the kin investment of aunts and uncles we show that the laterality effect expected as a result of paternity uncertainty is statistically reliable but somewhat smaller than the sex effect. Matrilateral aunts invest significantly more than patrilateral aunts, and the same is true for uncles. Regardless of laterality, however, aunts invest significantly more than uncles. Multivariate controls show that the matrilateral bias is fully independent of any age or distance confounds that might result from sex differences in age at marriage or dispersal. We discuss our results in relation to recent findings on the kin investment of grandparents (Euler and Weitzel 1996). In addition, we propose a simple method for estimating the level of paternity uncertainty from kin investment data; application of this method to our data on aunts and uncles suggests that between 13% and 20% of children are not the offspring of their putative father. Our parallel analyses of Euler and Weitzel’s (1996) data on grandparental investment suggest a similar estimate, that paternity uncertainty lies between 9% and 17%.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Discriminative grandparental solicitude as reproductive strategyHuman Nature, 1996
- Whose baby are you?Nature, 1995
- The male's dilemma: Increased offspring production is more paternity to stealEvolutionary Ecology, 1995
- Whom are Mexican infants said to resemble? Monitoring and fostering paternal confidence in the YucatanEthology and Sociobiology, 1993
- Sex differences in ability to recognize family resemblanceEthology and Sociobiology, 1990
- Matrilineal inheritance: New theory and analysisBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1985
- Whom are newborn babies said to resemble?Ethology and Sociobiology, 1982