"Some Effects of Trainers on Their T Groups" Reconsidered
- 1 April 1975
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science
- Vol. 11 (2) , 190-196
- https://doi.org/10.1177/002188637501100204
Abstract
The identity of T-Group trainer effectiveness indicators in Bolman's studies (1971a & 1973) was pursued through comprehensive analyses of intermeasure correlations. Labeled the Acceptance versus Rejection of Others (ARO), a powerful undergirding dimension was found more potent than the Congruence-empathy indicator stressed by Bolman. ARO closely resembles the Love/Hostility dimension salient in much independent research, including the Caring factor found important to the encounter group leader's effectiveness by Lieberman, Yalom, and Miles (1973) and the Consideration factor of the Ohio State leadership scales. Perhaps due to limitations of his measures, Bolman's data yielded surprisingly weak traces of the second principal interpersonal dimension, Dominance/Submission. It seemed well represented by Meaning Attribution in Lieberman et al.'s research and by Initiating Structure in the Ohio State work.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Psychometric properties of the Ohio State leadership scales.Psychological Bulletin, 1974
- Some Effects of Trainers on Their Groups: A Partial ReplicationThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1973
- Point by Point-In Reply to HlurleyThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1971
- The Neglected Effects of Trainers on T GroupsThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1971
- Some Effects of Trainers on their T GroupsThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1971
- Convergences in the analysis of the structure of interpersonal behavior.Psychological Review, 1961
- Elementary Linkage Analysis for Isolating Orthogonal and Oblique Types and Typal RelevanciesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1957