Comparison of attached algal communities on natural and artificial substrata along a thermal gradient
Open Access
- 1 September 1979
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in British Phycological Journal
- Vol. 14 (3) , 243-254
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00071617900650281
Abstract
Colonization rate and community structure of periphyton assemblages was examined on aluminium and glass substrata and compared to populations on four submerged macrophyte species in three temperature zones in Cholla Lake, Arizona, U.S.A. Higher densities were achieved over shorter incubation intervals in the warmer zones (26–35° C). Representatives from the planktonic diatom community were first to colonize artificial substrata during the initial two hour incubation period in all temperature zones. Two periphyton diatom representatives, Amphora coffeiformis and Cocconeis placentula var. lineata were the numerical dominants after one week. Cocconeis placentula var. lineata was most competitive on natural substrata at temperatures 26°C with no significant preferences for artificial or natural substrata. The significance of temperature, specific conductance and availability of living hosts is discussed with respect to regulating populations of these two common periphytic diatom species in alkaline waters in southwestern U.S.A. Similarity indices (SIMI) were used to compare algal assemblages on various natural and artificial substrata pairs. Periphyton assemblages were very similar on all natural substrata within similar temperature zones, with little or no preference for macrophyte species displaying similar leaf morphology. Diatom assemblages were quite similar on aluminium and glass substrata throughout the incubation period in all temperature zones, while blue-green algal populations were significantly different, particularly in the higher temperature zones (>28°C). Natural periphyton communities were best represented after four weeks incubation with aluminium substrata in warmer temperature zones (>28°C) or where filamentous blue-green algae dominated. The selection of adequate incubation time when employing artificial substrata to evaluate natural assemblages for different environmental conditions and algal populations is discussed.This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comparison of diatom epiphytes, their diversity and density, attached toMyriophyllum spicatumL. in Norfolk dykes and BroadsBritish Phycological Journal, 1978
- Phycoperiphyton (Algae) as Indicators of Water QualityTransactions of the American Microscopical Society, 1978
- Evaluation of Natural and Artificial Substrate Colonization by Scanning Electron MicroscopyTransactions of the American Microscopical Society, 1977
- A COMPARISON OF THE ATTACHED ALGAL COMMUNITIES OF A NATURAL AND AN ARTIFICIAL SUBSTRATE1Journal of Phycology, 1976
- The fine structure of the periphyton of Chara sp. and Potamogeton natans from Wytham Pond, Oxford, and its significance to the macrophyte‐periphyton metabolic model of R. G. Wetzel and H. L. AllenFreshwater Biology, 1973
- Primary Productivity, Chemo‐organotrophy, and Nutritional Interactions of Epiphytic Algae and Bacteria on Macrophytes in the Littoral of a LakeEcological Monographs, 1971
- The Use of Artificial Substrates in Pollution SurveysThe American Midland Naturalist, 1969
- MEASUREMENT OF STREAM PERIPHYTON ON PARAFFIN‐COATED SUBSTRATES1Limnology and Oceanography, 1968
- The inverted microscope method of estimating algal numbers and the statistical basis of estimations by countingHydrobiologia, 1958
- Colonization of artificial bare areas by microorganismsThe Botanical Review, 1956