The Incidence of HIV Drug Resistance and Its Impact on Progression of HIV Disease Among Antiretroviral-Naïve Participants Started on Three Different Antiretroviral Therapy Strategies
- 1 December 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in HIV Research & Clinical Practice
- Vol. 8 (6) , 357-370
- https://doi.org/10.1310/hct0806-357
Abstract
Background: Treatment-naïve participants were randomized to three antiretroviral strategies (all with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor [NRTI] background): protease inhibitor (PI), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), or PI+NNRTI. The strategies were compared for drug resistance at first virologic failure (VF; HIV RNA >1000 copies/mL). The impact of resistance on AIDS or death was determined. Method: Drug resistance was determined by genotype. Cox models were used to compare the strategies for VF with resistance and to determine the impact of resistance on AIDS or death. Results: Of 1,360 participants, 866 experienced VF; 226 experienced AIDS or death (median follow-up 5 years). Rates (per 100 personyears) for VF with resistance were 14.9 (PI), 10.8 (NNRTI), and 11.5 (PI+NNRTI); hazard ratio (HR) was 0.78 (95% CI 0.61–0.99) for NNRTI versus PI. Compared to those with no VF, there was a significantly increased risk of AIDS or death for participants with solitary NNRTI resistance (HR 2.31, 95% CI 1.46–3.66) and for those failing with no known resistance (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.18–2.68). Participants failing with solitary NNRTI resistance and with no resistance had the lowest percent of time on antiretroviral treatment (ART) and the lowest cumulative mean adherence scores. Conclusion: For treatment-naïve participants, the risk of AIDS or death is increased for those who failed virologically with solitary NNRTI resistance and those who failed with no known drug resistance compared to those with no virologic failure. Both the lack of ART exposure in nonadherent participants and the development of NNRTI resistance among those who take and fail their ART regimen predict poor clinical outcomes.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evolution of Genotypic Resistance Algorithms and Their Impact on the Interpretation of Clinical Trials: An OPTIMA Trial SubstudyHIV Research & Clinical Practice, 2007
- Continuous evidence of fast HIV disease progression related to class-wide resistance to antiretroviral drugs: a 6 year follow-up analysis of a large observational databaseAIDS, 2007
- Emergence of Drug Resistance Is Associated with an Increased Risk of Death among Patients First Starting HAARTPLoS Medicine, 2006
- Antiretroviral adherence, drug resistance, viral fitness and HIV disease progression: a tangled web is wovenJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2005
- Prevalence of Antiretroviral Drug Resistance Mutations in Chronically HIV-Infected, Treatment-Naive Patients: Implications for Routine Resistance Screening before Initiation of Antiretroviral TherapyClinical Infectious Diseases, 2005
- An algorithm‐based genotypic resistance score is associated with clinical outcome in HIV‐1‐infected adults on antiretroviral therapyHIV Medicine, 2004
- Antiretroviral Resistance among HIV‐Infected Persons Who Have Died in British Columbia, in the Era of Modern Antiretroviral TherapyThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2004
- HIV Drug ResistanceNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Structured Treatment Interruption in Patients with Multidrug-Resistant Human Immunodeficiency VirusNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Sustained CD4+T Cell Response after Virologic Failure of Protease Inhibitor–Based Regimens in Patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus InfectionThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2000