Effect of Fetal Position on Second-Stage Duration and Labor Outcome
- 1 April 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Vol. 105 (4) , 763-772
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000154889.47063.84
Abstract
To evaluate the effect of fetal position on 1) second-stage labor duration and 2) indicators of maternal and neonatal morbidity. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a database from a previously reported randomized clinical trial. The data set includes 210 women with the fetus in a posterior position, 200 women with the fetus in a transverse position, and 1,198 women with the fetus in an anterior position. Mean durations of the second stage of labor for different fetal positions were compared using Tukey studentized test. A multivariate logistic regression model was performed to examine the determinants of prolonged second-stage duration (>or= 3 hours). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to graph and compare the duration of the second stage of labor for spontaneous delivery according to the fetal position at full dilatation and study group. Fetal malposition at full dilatation was associated with a significantly increased risk of instrumental vaginal delivery, cesarean delivery, oxytocin administration before full cervical dilatation, episiotomy, severe perineal laceration, and maternal blood loss of more than 500 mL (all P values < .01). Compared with the occiput anterior positions, there were significant differences in the duration of the second stage of labor, with a mean of 3.1 hours (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.0-3.2) for occiput anterior positions, 3.6 hours (95% CI 3.3-3.9) for occiput transverse positions (P < .05), and 3.8 hours (95% CI 3.5-4.1) for occiput posterior positions (P < .05) in the delayed pushing group. For the early pushing group, means were 2.2 hours (95% CI 2.1-2.3) for occiput anterior positions, 2.5 hours (95% CI 2.3-2.8) for occiput transverse positions (P < .05), and 3.0 hours (95% CI 2.7-3.3) for occiput posterior positions (P < .05). Fetal malposition at full dilatation results in a higher risk of prolonged second stage of labor and increases maternal morbidity indicators. II-2.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- A randomised clinical trial comparing the effects of delayed versus immediate pushing with epidural analgesia on mode of delivery and faecal continenceBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2002
- Randomized trial of epidural versus intravenous analgesia during laborPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,2000
- A template for defining a causal relation between acute intrapartum events and cerebral palsy: international consensus statementBMJ, 1999
- Intrapartum Sonography and Persistent Occiput Posterior Position: A Study of 408 DeliveriesPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1998
- Does station of the fetal head at epidural placement affect the position of the fetal vertex at delivery?American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1996
- The characteristics of the second stage of labour in 25 069 singleton deliveries in the North West Thames Health Region, 1988BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1992
- Epidural Analgesia and Cesarean Section for Dystocia: Risk Factors in NulliparasAmerican Journal of Perinatology, 1991
- Oxytocin infusion during second stage of labour in primiparous women using epidural analgesia: a randomised double blind placebo controlled trial.BMJ, 1989
- Lumbar epidural analgesia in labour: relation to fetal malposition and instrumental delivery.BMJ, 1977
- OCCIPUT POSTERIOR POSITIONJAMA, 1954