Abstract
The results of 6 months' experience in routine screening for deep-vein thrombosis in all postoperative patients in a district general hospital are presented. Clinical methods and ultrasound diagnosis are compared. Ultrasound was found to be easy and safe to use and to be more accurate than clinical methods. A case is made for the use of ultrasound as a routine method of screening postoperative patients for deep-vein thrombosis.
Funding Information
  • South East Regional Metropolitan Hospital Board